Home
Robin D. Laws - Schulz and Peanuts
January 31st, 2008
09:20 am

[Link]

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
Schulz and Peanuts
page hit counter

Schulz and Peanuts, by David Michaelis, is a completely absorbing, stunningly researched, pain-scorched biography of the last century’s most influential cartoonist.

Charles Schulz’s genius was built on traits common to great artists: unstinting discipline, narrowness of focus, solipsism, arrogance, self-doubt, independence, competitiveness, an embracing humanism, hunger for the new, a sense of unquenchable aloneness, and a taste for passive aggressive revenge.

I knew enough about Charles Schulz going in to understand that his avuncular public image belied a lifelong sense of torment and so wasn’t shocked or surprised to learn of his dark side. What did startle me was just how autobiographical Peanuts turns out to be.

Snoopy’s weird relatives from the strip’s last years evoke Schulz’s unhappy memories of his brawling, drunken Norwegian maternal relatives. His oil-and-water pairing with his first wife (she, extroverted and demanding; he, introverted and withholding) plays out, alternately, in Charlie Brown’s struggles with the wily, domineering Lucy, or in her fruitless, bullheaded advances on the resistant Schroeder.

At one point, when their long marriage is finally crumbling, Joyce Schulz is frantically looking for evidence of an affair. If only she’d bothered to read the strip, she’d have found everything she was looking for, in Snoopy’s delirious infatuation with the cute girl beagle at the Daisy Hill Puppy Farm.

Michaelis takes full advantage of the ability to insert salient strips into his text, using them to illustrate his points. His two-paragraph description of the ritual power of reiterative comic strip elements is brilliance distilled. The worst criticism of the book I can make is that he buys in a little too hurriedly to the idea that the genius of the strip drains away when Schulz remarries and achieves a greater sense of emotional security. But then the book already exceeds five hundred pages, and a more exhaustive take on the later years would probably expand it beyond endurable length.

[info]muskrat_john, you doubtless know this already, but this book is for you.

Tags:

(Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:[info]spacecrime
Date:January 31st, 2008 03:19 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The Fantagraphics collections are well worth re-reading in the context of the biography. There are moments when Schulz is just playing around and having fun, but the voice of the author grappling with is own life really starts to jump out at you.
[User Picture]
From:[info]doccross
Date:January 31st, 2008 04:25 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I'll have to give that book a read.

Of course, now I'll be reading comic strips and webcomics looking to see what they say about the authors inner demons. Hmmm...perhaps I won't do that with The Birds...:)
[User Picture]
From:[info]bruceb
Date:January 31st, 2008 06:05 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I've been browsing the book and finding it thoroughly convincing, but in fairness I must note that Mark Evanier, who's in a position to know some and to know others who know more, has very serious criticisms of the book and Michaelis' methods. Should turn up in his archives.

[User Picture]
From:[info]robin_d_laws
Date:January 31st, 2008 08:01 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Having read the book I found this summation of the controversy to be pretty much spot-on: http://www.quickstopentertainment.com/2007/11/27/comics-in-context-204-was-it-a-dark-and-stormy-life/
[User Picture]
From:[info]wanton_heat_jet
Date:February 1st, 2008 02:47 pm (UTC)

Peanuts' dark side

(Link)
I like the strip more now. Thanks.

If only Family Circus had a dark side.
unique visitor counter Powered by LiveJournal.com